RSS

DistribYOUTUBEd Learning

04 Nov

Everybody knows what YouTube is, right?  It’s where you watch those crazy cat videos (or in my case dog videos), video replays of awesome sports clips, or videos of an artist you like.  But this past week, I learned a few things about YouTube that I never knew or even thought about.

While I was exploring areas of YouTube whose links they keep tucked away at the bottom of the page, I discovered:

  • CitizenTube — YouTube’s News & Politics blog.  I’m not sure this would be the best place to stay up on current events since the last post here is from May 2012.  There has been a bit of political news since then, right?
  • TestTube — YouTube’s Idea Incubator where they try out new ideas before deciding whether to make them a standard feature on the site.

So, there’s no question that there is a LOT of content on YouTube, a fair amount of which you can use for educational purposes.  If all this information is out there for the taking, who really owns the content? Enter Margaret Gould Stewart, former head of user experience at YouTube (now head of product design for Facebook).  She gave a Ted Talk (one of her “bucket list” items) in 2010 about what she calls “the digital rights ecosystem” and specifically the Content ID system at YouTube.

As an original content owner, you can register your material with YouTube in their Content ID system.  As the owner of the rights, you can also determine what policy you want YouTube to apply if and when someone tries to upload the same content. Surprisingly, or maybe not, Stewart says most rights owners allow copies to be uploaded because they “then benefit through the exposure, advertising, and linked sales.”  The example Stewart gives of why an artist, for example, might be okay with his work being used by someone else is the video of the wedding party making their entrance to Chris Brown’s song “Forever,” which had come and gone from the charts 18 months before the wedding.  Not only did this “little wedding video” get over 40 million views, but Chris Brown’s old song went back up to #4 on the iTunes chart.

You can search for copycat videos and spoofs of the wedding party entrance, and even NBC “borrowed” the idea from the video for an episode of “The Office.”  (I was going to link to a video of that, but that WAS copyright protected.)  NBC’s high-profile takeoff on the amateur wedding video proves Stewart’s point about digital rights being an ecosystem because “it’s not just amateurs borrowing from big studios, but sometimes big studios borrowing back.”

Stewart’s advice to content owners is simple.  “If you have content that others are uploading to YouTube, you should register it in the Content ID system, and then you’ll have the choice about how your content is used.”  She goes on to say that by allowing your work to be reused, you’re opening it up to all sorts of new possibilities, including new audiences and new distribution channels.  And isn’t that what distributed learning is all about?

 
4 Comments

Posted by on November 4, 2012 in ADLT 641

 

Tags: , , ,

4 responses to “DistribYOUTUBEd Learning

  1. MelKoch

    November 5, 2012 at 10:42 am

    I referenced you in my blog, but thank you for making me realize how embedded YouTube is in our popular culture. It happens so much I don’t even realize it.

    I loved your research about “owning” content on YouTube. If I ever upload anything, I will be sure to look into the content ID system. I do think Creative Commons and sharing content is a very powerful thing, but sometimes you want something to stay yours, you know? Just ask the entire music industry. 😉

     
  2. jshill2

    November 7, 2012 at 2:34 pm

    Good to know!! Thanks for sharing these discoveries. 😉 I think it’s really interesting how marketing can play such a huge role in the choice to “share or not to share”. My blog post this week actually looked at some of that as it relates to product advertising (i.e. when and why user-generated content is a good idea in the marketing realm).

     
  3. bwatwood

    November 10, 2012 at 8:27 am

    Echoing Melissa’s comment, the concept behind Creative Commons is powerful. One should register their content in any media, but consider sharing as a responsibility too. Notice that all the technology areas of the CTE are licensed with Creative Commons, where we have chosen the Share-Alike, Non-Commercial option.

     

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
%d bloggers like this: